In a game against the New York Jets that September, what officials first called a sack-fumble that New England recovered got converted into an incomplete pass upon review. Ironically enough, this same “tuck rule” had affected a Patriots game earlier in the 2001 season. In re-watching the game film with Woodson, Brady admitted that he wanted to tuck the ball, but had not yet done so - while Woodson believed he had completed the process of tucking the ball, meaning the play should have been called a fumble under the rule then in effect. Īlthough he bungled the explanation of the rule to the crowd that day, Coleman said in the documentary that because Brady had not completed the process of tucking the ball, the rule meant the play had to be called an incomplete pass. ![]() Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble. NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2. When player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. In calling the play an incompletion, Coleman cited a rule put into place in 1999: The officials reviewed the play, and referee Walt Coleman called the play an incomplete pass, meaning New England would keep the ball. As he did so, the ball came out of his hands - Oakland recovered, and officials awarded the Raiders possession. Brady had cocked his arm to pass, but upon discovering Woodson, attempted to pull the ball back. Woodson came on a corner blitz to Brady’s blindside. While misreading the defensive coverage, the then-young Brady admitted that he fell for the veteran Allen’s trap. Allen dropped back in coverage, trying to bait Brady into throwing an interception that would seal the game for Oakland.īrady never got the chance. He then relayed the play call to his Raider teammates. ![]() With just under two minutes remaining in the game, Raiders cornerback Eric Allen heard Brady receive the call for the next play while lurking on the Patriots sideline. Late in the game, with his team trailing 13-10, Brady needed to lead his team down the field for a field goal to tie the match and force overtime. The snow made footing difficult, and both teams struggled to score. 19, 2002 clash between Brady’s New England Patriots and Woodson’s Raiders took place in a winter wonderland, with several inches of snow falling during the game on a chilly New England night. ![]() The last game ever played at Foxboro Stadium, the Jan. The former Michigan Wolverines, Brady and cornerback Charles Woodson, reunited at Brady’s mansion in Tampa to watch film of the game. The fact that the two came together for the documentary gave the film a subtle yet unmistakable signal about the value of sportsmanship and friendship in athletics. an ironic twist, they had played together a few years before the incident at the University of Michigan. And now, he’s bringing it up on TikTok, where in potentially-trolling fashion, he responded to Justin Bieber‘s “Tell me something honest” prompt with “The Tuck Rule play…might have been a fumble.”Įveryone keep this on the down low please. ” Brady, the once and current Tampa Bay Buccaneers‘ quarterback, also discussed that play in the first episode of the Religion of Sports/ESPN series Man In The Arena last fall. In that documentary, Brady said that if not for the officials’ ruling on that play (that it was an incomplete pass rather than a fumble), “ I’m probably the backup QB going into 2002. ESPN came out with a 30 for 30 documentary on it earlier this year, which largely centered around Tom Brady and Charles Woodson discussing their different perspectives on the play. 19, 2022 AFC divisional playoff “ Tuck Rule” game between the Oakland Raiders and the New England Patriots is still inspiring a lot of discussion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |